Menu
Aaron Morris
  • Publications by Aaron Morris
  • Best Financial Hacks
  • Loving the Law
  • All Articles
Aaron Morris

Posturing Attorney Perils

Posted on July 13, 2022January 27, 2023

posturing attorney on phone

A posturing attorney introduced me to a technique I had not yet experienced.

Yesterday, I served an anti-SLAPP motion on the two attorneys listed on the complaint. This morning I received an email from one of those attorneys, acknowledging receipt of the motion, and asking that I change our proof of service going forward. He asked me to add six more attorneys to the proof, all from the same firm.

I don’t like to come right out of the gate being obstructive. Doing so can create an unnecessarily adversarial atmosphere for the entire action. But I found the request to be entirely unreasonable. I can certainly understand that any firm would want to afford every attorney, paralegal, and secretary there the opportunity to read my prose, but that should be handled on their end, perhaps with some distribution list entitled, “This Guy Writes Like Shakespeare.” Unless you intend to list all eight attorneys on the pleadings, I don’t think it is my task to serve everyone you think might be interested.

It was clear to me that this was a form of posturing, as in:

“You better be worried. We’ve assigned eight attorneys to this matter; ready to jump on anything you send. That anti-SLAPP motion you served? We all laughed at your anti-SLAPP motion. We fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries!”

Perhaps I read too much into the request, but I don’t think so.

And as I have written many times, posturing often just comes back to humiliate you. Within five minutes of my email, opposing counsel called with a contrite tone. He asked if we would agree to continue the hearing on the motion to some later date. As it turns out, in the couple of hours between the “please add our entire firm to the proof of service” email, and the receipt of my response, the firm decided to fire the client. The requested continuance was being sought in order to afford the client some additional time to find new counsel.

What could have possibly occurred during those couple of hours? Mayhap they read the motion? Or perhaps the client wasn’t too happy with his case being staffed by eight attorneys.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Contact Aaron Morris

Aaron Morris
Random Thoughts Publishing
Orchard Technology Park
11 Orchard Road, Suite 106
Lake Forest, CA 92630

(951) 339-1500
Email Aaron Morris

Useful Information?

Buy me coffee logo

From Best Financial Hacks

  • Woman with Credit CardThink Twice Before You “Upgrade” Your Credit Card
  • 35 percent offSave 35% On All Your Purchases!
  • guide to benefits6 Crazy Good Credit Card Benefits You are Missing
  • fly free to hawaiiHow to Fly FREE to Hawaii, First Class, Every Year, for the Rest of Your Life!
  • side hustleThe Importance of a Side Gig and Why You Need to Know Your “Hourly Rate”
  • Man with credit cardGame Changer — Chase Freedom Flex Credit Card Review
  • spend points on amazonNever Spend Your Points on Amazon (or Cash Them Out)
  • 0% credit cards calculationsThe 0% Credit Card Strategy – Best Financial Hacks
  • Instant GratificationWhy Instant Gratification can be Financially Savvy
  • cash tax on laptop purchaseShove Your Financial Statistics; I Choose Not to Participate
  • cash taxStop Wasting Money on the Cash Tax!
  • woman with credit cardWhy You Need this Credit Card – Discover It Review
  • fired woman with box9 Employment Myths that Will Bite You in the Butt
  • social securityThe Gonzo Guide to Social Security

From Loving the Law

  • Putting the “Alternative” Back Into Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Morris & Stone Wins $3.9 Million Defamation Judgment
  • The Case of the Thin-Skinned Councilman — Loving the Law
  • MichiganThe Case of the Motorhome Snob — A Jurisdictional Tale
  • man in treeHow I Defeated an anti-SLAPP Motion by Doing Almost Nothing
  • Botox partyYou Got Me in Trouble With the Law, so Now You Have to Pay
  • greedy businessmanThe Case of the Greedy Investor – Loving the Law
  • angry attorneyThe Case of the Posturing Attorney — Loving the Law
  • lending moneyThe Case of the Man Who Needed Some Tough Love — Loving the Law
  • super heroes making the law betterMaking the Law Better, One Crazy Case at a Time
  • You’ve Got to Know When to Hold Them, Know When to Fold Them

Disclaimer

3D illustration of "DISCLAIMER" title on legal document

NOTICE PURSUANT TO BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE SECTION 6158.3: This is not a legal site. In my “Loving the Law” series, I tell stories that illustrate why I enjoy practicing law. While I sometimes use my litigation victories as the basis for a story, the outcome of any case will depend on the facts specific to that case. Nothing contained in any portion of this web site should be taken as a representation of how your particular case would be concluded, or even that a case with similar facts will have a similar result. The result of any case discussed herein was dependent on the facts of that case, and the results will differ if based on different facts. And of course, nothing here should be taken as legal advice.

©2023 Aaron Morris | WordPress Theme by Superb WordPress Themes
Cleantalk Pixel